"In the car" by Roy Lichtenstein:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66125/66125550d59b8e2b64f7d8d09e3b2ec4d5101d51" alt=""
Me putting my face in a hole:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aabb6/aabb69410d3cbd1cbf8d9f704b05cc1cded973d2" alt=""
I was inspired to make myself into a cartoon right out of a Roy Lichtenstein painting. I saw Lichtenstein's work at the Guggenheim in 2003 and honestly, I was totally unimpressed by his oeuvre. Years later I find myself appreciating his pieces. There is something funny, tongue in cheek about his paintings. Are these women/muses his ex-girlfriends? Is he intrigued by the drama of the damsel in distress? I think this whole wet tissue view of women is rather hilarious because I can be that way sometimes. In 2003 walking up the spiral Gugg, I kept on thinking, is Lichtenstein just delving deeper into Picasso's portrayal of a weeping woman but in a softer way, taking another turn? I remember hearing the story of "The Weeping Woman" in Art History, how this painting below is Picasso's ex-girlfriend, Dora Maar, and how Picasso left Maar. What a horrible way to be remembered in history.
The Weeping Woman by Picasso:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3caeb/3caebaf6931eac98d6a481267c6966ab1074b182" alt=""
So I decided to speak for Maar. Or maybe I'm full of shit. Who knows? I do know that Lichtenstein's paintings haunt some of my dream life like a melody.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66125/66125550d59b8e2b64f7d8d09e3b2ec4d5101d51" alt=""
Me putting my face in a hole:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aabb6/aabb69410d3cbd1cbf8d9f704b05cc1cded973d2" alt=""
I was inspired to make myself into a cartoon right out of a Roy Lichtenstein painting. I saw Lichtenstein's work at the Guggenheim in 2003 and honestly, I was totally unimpressed by his oeuvre. Years later I find myself appreciating his pieces. There is something funny, tongue in cheek about his paintings. Are these women/muses his ex-girlfriends? Is he intrigued by the drama of the damsel in distress? I think this whole wet tissue view of women is rather hilarious because I can be that way sometimes. In 2003 walking up the spiral Gugg, I kept on thinking, is Lichtenstein just delving deeper into Picasso's portrayal of a weeping woman but in a softer way, taking another turn? I remember hearing the story of "The Weeping Woman" in Art History, how this painting below is Picasso's ex-girlfriend, Dora Maar, and how Picasso left Maar. What a horrible way to be remembered in history.
The Weeping Woman by Picasso:
So I decided to speak for Maar. Or maybe I'm full of shit. Who knows? I do know that Lichtenstein's paintings haunt some of my dream life like a melody.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0ada/c0ada9a930f7b6ace7dfec2d98cb99c736a7b3e9" alt=""
Comments